SerpApi has asked a federal judge to dismiss a high-profile lawsuit filed by Google. SerpApi claims that Google is accusing it of the very work Google has done for decades. The filing argues that SerpApi only collects information that is visible to any web user.
Google sued SerpApi in December. The complaint says SerpApi used automated tools to bypass Google safeguards and to resell content from search results. The company asked a court to stop the scraping and to block tools that it calls evasive.
SerpApi answered with a blunt claim. It says Google built its business by crawling and copying the public web. SerpApi says it does much the same on a smaller scale. The response also argues that Google is stretching the law to shield its commercial interests rather than to protect copyrighted works.
DMCA Locks Face Legal Challenge
The case turns on a legal question that matters for the whole web. The law at issue is the anti-circumvention section of the DMCA. That law bans breaking technological locks that protect copyrighted works. SerpApi says Google’s anti-bot system does not meet that legal definition. Google says the safeguards are real protections that were made to block scraping. The two sides disagree about what counts as a lock or a barrier.
Halimah DeLaine Prado was quoted when Google filed the suit. Google’s general counsel said the company would protect the rights of content partners.
The dispute also includes other players. Reddit previously filed a related suit against several scraping services. Large publishers and data owners have sued scraping services in different ways, too. Some rights holders argue that scraping can take licensed content and repurpose it in ways that harm the market for the original work.
hiQ Labs LinkedIn
Second is a recent judge-made ruling about scraping and robots.txt in litigation centered on training AI models. The judge declined to treat a robots.txt instruction as a locked technological barrier for DMCA circumvention claims. That opinion has caused courts and companies to rethink how the DMCA applies to web crawling.
Civil liberties groups have weighed in on the side of open scraping. The Electronic Frontier Foundation argues that public scraping enables research and competition and that the DMCA should not become a tool for building paywalled data monopolies. The group warns that broad anti-circumvention claims can chill lawful work.
Reporting and legal analysis show that courts are divided and that much will depend on technical detail. Judges look at how a scraper works and at the exact meaning of a site defense. The definition of a technological protection measure under the DMCA will be central.
What this Means for AI and Search
The outcome could shape how companies build and train AI models. Scraped web data has been a major input to many large models. Publishers and platforms want compensation or control. Tech firms that rely on public web signals want predictable access. The case may influence contracts, platform practices, and investment in defensive tools.
Large technology companies are investing in systems that try to spot bots and to limit automated queries. SerpApi says those systems are meant to keep rivals out rather than to protect original works. Google says the measures protect partners who license special content for its search results. The judge will have to decide whether those measures are the kind of locks the DMCA was meant to stop others from bypassing.
