A U.S. judge ruled that Google used unfair tricks to control parts of the online advertising market. The court said Google’s actions hurt websites and businesses by making it harder for them to earn money from ads. This is the second time Google has lost a big legal fight about controlling markets after a similar case about its search engine last year.
What Did Google Do Wrong?
The court said Google forced websites and advertisers to use its tools instead of letting them choose competitors. For over ten years, Google tied its ad tools together so that anyone using one part had to use the others. This made it almost impossible for other companies to compete.
Example of Google’s Control
Imagine if a playground bully made everyone use only their soccer ball and goals. Google acted like that bully in the ad world. Websites had to use Google’s tools to show ads, and Google took a big cut of the money. This left less cash for news sites and bloggers.
How This Hurts Websites and Users
When Google controls ads, it takes more money from every ad sale. This means
- Websites earn less, making it harder to pay for good content.
- Businesses pay more to run ads, which can raise product prices.
- Users see more ads because websites need to make up for lost income.
Newsgroups cheered the ruling, saying it could help save local journalism.
Google’s Response
Google says it will appeal the decision. A Google leader said, “We won part of this case and will fight the rest. Our tools help websites make money easily.” The company claims its ad systems are popular because they work well, not because of unfair control.
The judge also criticized Google for deleting chat records during the trial. She said this was wrong, but did not punish Google because there was enough other evidence.
What Happens Next
The court will now decide how to fix the problem. Possible changes include
- Making Google sell parts of its ad business.
- Forcing Google to let competitors work with its tools.
- Google must stop selecting its services over others during ad auctions.
Websites would experience increased revenue, together with reduced business expenses, because of these alterations. The appeal process started by Google promises to prolong litigation for numerous years.
Why This Matters for Everyone
The majority of websites you browse use advertising solutions from Google. A business that maintains excessive market control can charge higher prices while reducing consumer alternatives. The judgment shows big tech firms that they need to prioritize equitable treatment of users. The revision of Google’s advertising system can result in improved online content quality, together with reduced intrusive advertisements. New ideas and improved tools for everybody became possible because small businesses received an opportunity to enter the market through this ruling.
